(My Original Blog Post: http://ping.fm/MSIsh)
y2009k asked:
nited conditions and its main European allies again largely a common view of the problems they face? of? � the world from Afghanistan and nuclear disarmament to the economic crisis. The emergence of new American president in the world by the dandy of the surface world was more than impressive: to participate in three high-level actions to immediately accompanying five hundred people. Much more important, however, how efficient this openness to him Europe as well as its openness to Europe turned out to be. Both at home and abroad becomes a habit to consider Barack Obama as antipodes to George Bush junior. It was expected that his election would change everything, at least, wholly located rappresentilo. The cooling of transatlantic relations that have lasted eight years during the presidency of his predecessor had to stop, at a minimum. From the first stage, the popularity of the new president of the United States in the Old World was too high, not because he finally condemned? of? the diplomacy of the cowboy? of? �. Now must find an alternative to it. But the main question for Obama remains the same: to what degree can influence its European allies and, correspondingly, what their assistance he can calculate it. Today, two major concerns of the Western world are absolutely clear: the economy and the global collective security. In both cases, the method is to generate strong international fronts to address the growing challenges. So that preliminary results can be made on the basis of the multiple meetings and statements from the White House is directing during the events mentioned? We EuropeConcerning-summit in London, European leaders were satisfied with Obama 's commitment to share responsibilities for response to global crisis with other powers. Then, Nicolas Sarkozy, who wanted to leave the summit unless the decisions were accepted there, said that the results exceeded his expectations. It is not surprising: almost all the requirements by Germany and France have been considered in the final declaration. And the Europeans generally, behaving calmly and carefully, I managed to get the application by the significant concessions. But on the one hand the U.S. has rejected all possibility of external control over the regulation of financial markets and national European Union has awarded a. Moreover, Washington has blocked virtually all attempts to reform the financial architecture today. However, the discussion of the problems in the economy has demonstrated the absence of generally accepted methods of comparison of the phenomena of crisis. In a strict sense, has not turned into a big surprise because the economic systems of the participants are far from identical. Therefore it is important to emphasize the fact that the principle of the current administration in Washington has indicated that, in conformity with its promises, it was not intended for use both on the economic burdens and difficulties for existing European food only of favorable drilling a se. Obama did not say significantly, if the White House has any compromises agreed, stating only that the statement reflected the final approval of the Heads of the world. However, most of interest was caused by the possible prospects of cooperation in the sphere of foreign-policy. Since the two subsequent events have shown, within the positive expectations of the Europeans were more or less? the justified? � there were signs at all of arm-twisting from Washington as well. The NATO summit ended with a discharge of warm praise from all sides for the spirit of cooperation and unanimity at work. Obama 's efforts to reach out to Russia for arms talks, as well as help on Iran and Afghanistan, have been welcomed in Europe even if they pass the most part the heads of Berlin, Paris and Brussels.One can say that the United States and its major European allies again largely a common view of the problems they face? of? � the world from Afghanistan and nuclear disarmament to the economic crisis. However, the imperfections and doubts remain? of? � perhaps especially on how the NATO alliance should address what are known as being the 21st-century challenges. In line with their rhetoric of multilateralist, the countries' European predominant purpose apparently is to achieve some sort of parity with the United States. France has announced its return to NATO 'the military command structure of s after an absence of more than 40 years and its President Nicolas Sarkozy said he wants to develop a "Pillar" Europe, in NATO, with Germany. The axis for French-German NATO has finally been able to develop a counterweight to Washington 's global ambitions for the alliance. The summit has offered up a "statement" of vision, the goals and future of NATO started writing new "Concept." Strategic; The current was adopted in 1999, before 11 September 2001 and it is obviously obsolete. At the summit in Lisbon the following, the Allies have to bless the new concept, which is intended to provide a sense of purpose the alliance for free. Judging by appointing Ambassador Ivo Daalder of the United States to NATO, the management of South American? of? of today decides that the alliance must enlarge the geography of its activity. Daalder is a well-known expert in the problems of security, which promotes the idea of creating a league of? of? � democracies, the international organization? of? of the new beta, which can replace the UN to be able to conduct military operations over the whole world without consulting the Security Council.In his opinion that the alliance can become the center of this organization, member states of NATO of? of? � must think and act globally. Non-European democracies such as Japan, Australia and South Korea should be invited to join the alliance as experienced members. "The doctrine of Washington for the first time it was hinted that NATO could act beyond its territory . The new concept of security seems to suggest it to be more actively involved in operations all over, for example, somewhere in Somalia, Sudan and so on. As there is no guarantee that the idea of? of? of the globalization of NATO? of? � be supported by all members, some Europeans consider the espandentesi useless alliance also Afghanistan. Chancellor Merkel has reflected that view European discutent there may be no NATO. "Overall; As for Afghanistan, much of which Obama has proposed a successor is straight to the policies of previous management, with some re-ordering of priorities. He went still further recognizing the war will last a long time. He also said that it will be necessary to work towards the future of Pakistan, including some military operations there. And the United States take a greater part of the general difficulty. Indeed, while the U.S. is asking the Europeans to pay more and do more in areas that are not lethal, they produced their back from the pressure to increase their forces and reduce the limitations of what they can do. But the Americans once they realize that the difficulties concerning the soldiers of the United States and the Ministry of Treasury of the United States will develop, are likely to further criticism of NATO and even call into question its value. This can be made worse if some allies, the blind complacency of the United States take the lead, withdraw from their responsibilities in, even more. These problems were not resolved in Strasbourg-Kehl but just may be much longer on close. The United States probably will reinforce the reasons for the allies to do more in, and, potentially, the Middle East and southwest Asia. That should not be done by the president 's exhortation that "we have a responsibility to act ... because our own peace and security depends on it." For NATO to provide a useful future will require bridging the gap in perceptions between Member States U.S. and many European allies about what is important for safety and what to do about this. Both sides should begin to see other 'interests and concerns of s. A new contradiction in NATO is the lack of cohesion on Russia which is threatening to undermining its military effectiveness. Today the prospects for Georgia and Ukraine joining the alliance in the foreseeable future seem even more dim even though the declaration of the summit of NATO said that the door for both countries remains open. There are deep divisions over expansion, with the United States, Great Britain and the majority of new members that support it, while Germany, France and Italy have been more opposite a. Looking for a regional strategic partnership with Moscow, and in particular have been satisfied even allow Russia to handle NATO 'agenda of s: The French Defense Minister Herve Morin suggested that Russia should be consulted before NATO expand East. At the furthest EU-US summit in Prague that the two sides have also demonstrated the drive, for example, issuing a statement that said united Pyongyang 's development of a possible ballistic missile was "aimed at providing the ability to threaten the countries near and far to the weapons of mass destruction. "At the same time, when Obama tried to convince the Europeans need to accept Turkey to the European Union, its effort has caused irritation of Nikola Sarkozi, which immediately raised an objection. "I work with the Obama arm in arm, said French President? of? �. the? of? � but with regard to the concerns of the EU, the decision must be taken by EU member states themselves. "He added that this position of France is supported by the vast majority of European countries. To summarize his knowledge with the Old World, Obama said that? of? � clearly the relationship between the U.S. and Europe already? of? of strong.� but the U.S. president has received adoring there, his hopes of forging new global consensus stymied by some European leaders who saw a chance radrizzare the perceived wrongs that have allegedly suffered during the era Bush. This recalls the behavior of breast
nited conditions and its main European allies again largely a common view of the problems they face? of? � the world from Afghanistan and nuclear disarmament to the economic crisis. The emergence of new American president in the world by the dandy of the surface world was more than impressive: to participate in three high-level actions to immediately accompanying five hundred people. Much more important, however, how efficient this openness to him Europe as well as its openness to Europe turned out to be. Both at home and abroad becomes a habit to consider Barack Obama as antipodes to George Bush junior. It was expected that his election would change everything, at least, wholly located rappresentilo. The cooling of transatlantic relations that have lasted eight years during the presidency of his predecessor had to stop, at a minimum. From the first stage, the popularity of the new president of the United States in the Old World was too high, not because he finally condemned? of? the diplomacy of the cowboy? of? �. Now must find an alternative to it. But the main question for Obama remains the same: to what degree can influence its European allies and, correspondingly, what their assistance he can calculate it. Today, two major concerns of the Western world are absolutely clear: the economy and the global collective security. In both cases, the method is to generate strong international fronts to address the growing challenges. So that preliminary results can be made on the basis of the multiple meetings and statements from the White House is directing during the events mentioned? We EuropeConcerning-summit in London, European leaders were satisfied with Obama 's commitment to share responsibilities for response to global crisis with other powers. Then, Nicolas Sarkozy, who wanted to leave the summit unless the decisions were accepted there, said that the results exceeded his expectations. It is not surprising: almost all the requirements by Germany and France have been considered in the final declaration. And the Europeans generally, behaving calmly and carefully, I managed to get the application by the significant concessions. But on the one hand the U.S. has rejected all possibility of external control over the regulation of financial markets and national European Union has awarded a. Moreover, Washington has blocked virtually all attempts to reform the financial architecture today. However, the discussion of the problems in the economy has demonstrated the absence of generally accepted methods of comparison of the phenomena of crisis. In a strict sense, has not turned into a big surprise because the economic systems of the participants are far from identical. Therefore it is important to emphasize the fact that the principle of the current administration in Washington has indicated that, in conformity with its promises, it was not intended for use both on the economic burdens and difficulties for existing European food only of favorable drilling a se. Obama did not say significantly, if the White House has any compromises agreed, stating only that the statement reflected the final approval of the Heads of the world. However, most of interest was caused by the possible prospects of cooperation in the sphere of foreign-policy. Since the two subsequent events have shown, within the positive expectations of the Europeans were more or less? the justified? � there were signs at all of arm-twisting from Washington as well. The NATO summit ended with a discharge of warm praise from all sides for the spirit of cooperation and unanimity at work. Obama 's efforts to reach out to Russia for arms talks, as well as help on Iran and Afghanistan, have been welcomed in Europe even if they pass the most part the heads of Berlin, Paris and Brussels.One can say that the United States and its major European allies again largely a common view of the problems they face? of? � the world from Afghanistan and nuclear disarmament to the economic crisis. However, the imperfections and doubts remain? of? � perhaps especially on how the NATO alliance should address what are known as being the 21st-century challenges. In line with their rhetoric of multilateralist, the countries' European predominant purpose apparently is to achieve some sort of parity with the United States. France has announced its return to NATO 'the military command structure of s after an absence of more than 40 years and its President Nicolas Sarkozy said he wants to develop a "Pillar" Europe, in NATO, with Germany. The axis for French-German NATO has finally been able to develop a counterweight to Washington 's global ambitions for the alliance. The summit has offered up a "statement" of vision, the goals and future of NATO started writing new "Concept." Strategic; The current was adopted in 1999, before 11 September 2001 and it is obviously obsolete. At the summit in Lisbon the following, the Allies have to bless the new concept, which is intended to provide a sense of purpose the alliance for free. Judging by appointing Ambassador Ivo Daalder of the United States to NATO, the management of South American? of? of today decides that the alliance must enlarge the geography of its activity. Daalder is a well-known expert in the problems of security, which promotes the idea of creating a league of? of? � democracies, the international organization? of? of the new beta, which can replace the UN to be able to conduct military operations over the whole world without consulting the Security Council.In his opinion that the alliance can become the center of this organization, member states of NATO of? of? � must think and act globally. Non-European democracies such as Japan, Australia and South Korea should be invited to join the alliance as experienced members. "The doctrine of Washington for the first time it was hinted that NATO could act beyond its territory . The new concept of security seems to suggest it to be more actively involved in operations all over, for example, somewhere in Somalia, Sudan and so on. As there is no guarantee that the idea of? of? of the globalization of NATO? of? � be supported by all members, some Europeans consider the espandentesi useless alliance also Afghanistan. Chancellor Merkel has reflected that view European discutent there may be no NATO. "Overall; As for Afghanistan, much of which Obama has proposed a successor is straight to the policies of previous management, with some re-ordering of priorities. He went still further recognizing the war will last a long time. He also said that it will be necessary to work towards the future of Pakistan, including some military operations there. And the United States take a greater part of the general difficulty. Indeed, while the U.S. is asking the Europeans to pay more and do more in areas that are not lethal, they produced their back from the pressure to increase their forces and reduce the limitations of what they can do. But the Americans once they realize that the difficulties concerning the soldiers of the United States and the Ministry of Treasury of the United States will develop, are likely to further criticism of NATO and even call into question its value. This can be made worse if some allies, the blind complacency of the United States take the lead, withdraw from their responsibilities in, even more. These problems were not resolved in Strasbourg-Kehl but just may be much longer on close. The United States probably will reinforce the reasons for the allies to do more in, and, potentially, the Middle East and southwest Asia. That should not be done by the president 's exhortation that "we have a responsibility to act ... because our own peace and security depends on it." For NATO to provide a useful future will require bridging the gap in perceptions between Member States U.S. and many European allies about what is important for safety and what to do about this. Both sides should begin to see other 'interests and concerns of s. A new contradiction in NATO is the lack of cohesion on Russia which is threatening to undermining its military effectiveness. Today the prospects for Georgia and Ukraine joining the alliance in the foreseeable future seem even more dim even though the declaration of the summit of NATO said that the door for both countries remains open. There are deep divisions over expansion, with the United States, Great Britain and the majority of new members that support it, while Germany, France and Italy have been more opposite a. Looking for a regional strategic partnership with Moscow, and in particular have been satisfied even allow Russia to handle NATO 'agenda of s: The French Defense Minister Herve Morin suggested that Russia should be consulted before NATO expand East. At the furthest EU-US summit in Prague that the two sides have also demonstrated the drive, for example, issuing a statement that said united Pyongyang 's development of a possible ballistic missile was "aimed at providing the ability to threaten the countries near and far to the weapons of mass destruction. "At the same time, when Obama tried to convince the Europeans need to accept Turkey to the European Union, its effort has caused irritation of Nikola Sarkozi, which immediately raised an objection. "I work with the Obama arm in arm, said French President? of? �. the? of? � but with regard to the concerns of the EU, the decision must be taken by EU member states themselves. "He added that this position of France is supported by the vast majority of European countries. To summarize his knowledge with the Old World, Obama said that? of? � clearly the relationship between the U.S. and Europe already? of? of strong.� but the U.S. president has received adoring there, his hopes of forging new global consensus stymied by some European leaders who saw a chance radrizzare the perceived wrongs that have allegedly suffered during the era Bush. This recalls the behavior of breast
No comments:
Post a Comment