(My Original Blog Post: http://ping.fm/JAK77)
david singer asked:
Annapolis? came and went, but what? l happened? guarantees that the next 12 months of negotiations to achieve Bush two-state solution to end? up going nowhere - just like the useless negotiations conducted over the past four years. Annapolis has confirmed that these talks continue with Israel will be undertaken by the Organization for the Liberation of Palestine (PLO) - the letter referred specifically rejects the solution of the two conditions proposed by the Bush President.President can not? be unaware of the role of? s? the PLO? as one of the parties for negotiations. He picked himself out in Annapolis that a united statement prepared for the meeting stated that in the very first sentence: "of? of? of?; Representatives of the Government of the condition of Israel and the Palestinian liberation, represented respectively by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Mahmoud Abbas in his capacity as Chairman of the Executive Committee dell'OLP and President dell'autorit ? Palestinian Authority met in Annapolis, Maryland, under the auspices of President George W. Bush of the United States of America and with the support of the participants of this? of? of? of? of? International Conference of President Bush if he needed any other confirmation of this fact, the Mahmoud Abbas has given him in the first sentence of his speech: the? of? of? that allows me Mr. President thank him in my capacity as chairman of the Organization for the Liberation of Palestine, the only representative of the Palestinian people and on behalf of the Palestinian people, as inviting them to this? International? conferencing. dell'OLP the letter? anti as the solution of the two conditions could possibly be divided - not ambiguous wording stating that: 1. The Palestine with contours that had during the British mandate? un'unit? indivisible territorial .2. The Arab Palestinian people reject all solutions which are replacing (sic) the total liberation of Palestine.3. The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the imposition of the condition of Israel are entirely illegal4. The Balfour Declaration, the mandate for Palestine and everything that has been based on their position are considered and the minimum signal void.5. Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history6. Jews do not constitute a single nation with identity? of its own. As President Bush and Condoleezza Rice believes that the PLO can negotiate in good faith for a solution of the two conditions in the face of these fundamental obstacles to achieving such a result? one of the great mysteries that remains unanswered after the festivities, hand shakes and toasted bread were finished and everything? went home. The time line for the successful completion of these negotiations? supposed to allow President Bush leaves office in January 2009 as the president who could bring peace to the Middle East - certainly an effort worth the Nobel prize for peace, the eternal gratitude of nations and the favorable opinion of the story when it might detach . Ma? Clearly this can not ever happen and that his departure from the will? ignominious and humiliating - unless the PLO first amend its letter to remove these items immediately. President Bush and Ms Rice l $ should insist that this be done now is if these negotiations are continuing to have any prospect of success. These fixes have been promised 14 years ago but still remain unchanged as a witness to an organization that hates Jews, despises the notion of a solution of the two conditions and fails to recognize the binding effect of international law. Mahmoud Abbas did not simply power or authority? currently negotiating for a solution because the two conditions? establishing the PLO explicitly preclude him from acting in this way. Ci? non? some kind of discussion of technical hair splitting. Goes to the mindset within which negotiations must be undertaken and the ability? negotiating parties to achieve a solution. Mr. Abbas should be required to take action immediately to repeal these provisions of the pact before negotiations take place. Ci? ? something that can make very quickly - e. Can not? able to obtain the release of Israeli soldiers robbery, can not? power to arrest the terrorist attacks - but can very easy to summon a meeting of the National dell'OLP to repeal these odious provisions of the capacity? of Charter.The dell'OLP to move the peace - even if the above offense and offensive articles were removed today -? also highly questionable. The respected analyst Danny Rubinstein veteran has made very clear this out in an article written by him in the aretz? of? of Ha? November 16 when he declared: il? of? of? institutions dell'OLP who allegedly represent the entire Palestinian nation in recent years? become obsolete and unimportant. Do not include any representation for a national religious movement like Hamas (which holds that religion takes the nationality? Of precedence (sic), although its supporters make up hours about one third of the Palestinian public
Annapolis? came and went, but what? l happened? guarantees that the next 12 months of negotiations to achieve Bush two-state solution to end? up going nowhere - just like the useless negotiations conducted over the past four years. Annapolis has confirmed that these talks continue with Israel will be undertaken by the Organization for the Liberation of Palestine (PLO) - the letter referred specifically rejects the solution of the two conditions proposed by the Bush President.President can not? be unaware of the role of? s? the PLO? as one of the parties for negotiations. He picked himself out in Annapolis that a united statement prepared for the meeting stated that in the very first sentence: "of? of? of?; Representatives of the Government of the condition of Israel and the Palestinian liberation, represented respectively by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Mahmoud Abbas in his capacity as Chairman of the Executive Committee dell'OLP and President dell'autorit ? Palestinian Authority met in Annapolis, Maryland, under the auspices of President George W. Bush of the United States of America and with the support of the participants of this? of? of? of? of? International Conference of President Bush if he needed any other confirmation of this fact, the Mahmoud Abbas has given him in the first sentence of his speech: the? of? of? that allows me Mr. President thank him in my capacity as chairman of the Organization for the Liberation of Palestine, the only representative of the Palestinian people and on behalf of the Palestinian people, as inviting them to this? International? conferencing. dell'OLP the letter? anti as the solution of the two conditions could possibly be divided - not ambiguous wording stating that: 1. The Palestine with contours that had during the British mandate? un'unit? indivisible territorial .2. The Arab Palestinian people reject all solutions which are replacing (sic) the total liberation of Palestine.3. The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the imposition of the condition of Israel are entirely illegal4. The Balfour Declaration, the mandate for Palestine and everything that has been based on their position are considered and the minimum signal void.5. Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history6. Jews do not constitute a single nation with identity? of its own. As President Bush and Condoleezza Rice believes that the PLO can negotiate in good faith for a solution of the two conditions in the face of these fundamental obstacles to achieving such a result? one of the great mysteries that remains unanswered after the festivities, hand shakes and toasted bread were finished and everything? went home. The time line for the successful completion of these negotiations? supposed to allow President Bush leaves office in January 2009 as the president who could bring peace to the Middle East - certainly an effort worth the Nobel prize for peace, the eternal gratitude of nations and the favorable opinion of the story when it might detach . Ma? Clearly this can not ever happen and that his departure from the will? ignominious and humiliating - unless the PLO first amend its letter to remove these items immediately. President Bush and Ms Rice l $ should insist that this be done now is if these negotiations are continuing to have any prospect of success. These fixes have been promised 14 years ago but still remain unchanged as a witness to an organization that hates Jews, despises the notion of a solution of the two conditions and fails to recognize the binding effect of international law. Mahmoud Abbas did not simply power or authority? currently negotiating for a solution because the two conditions? establishing the PLO explicitly preclude him from acting in this way. Ci? non? some kind of discussion of technical hair splitting. Goes to the mindset within which negotiations must be undertaken and the ability? negotiating parties to achieve a solution. Mr. Abbas should be required to take action immediately to repeal these provisions of the pact before negotiations take place. Ci? ? something that can make very quickly - e. Can not? able to obtain the release of Israeli soldiers robbery, can not? power to arrest the terrorist attacks - but can very easy to summon a meeting of the National dell'OLP to repeal these odious provisions of the capacity? of Charter.The dell'OLP to move the peace - even if the above offense and offensive articles were removed today -? also highly questionable. The respected analyst Danny Rubinstein veteran has made very clear this out in an article written by him in the aretz? of? of Ha? November 16 when he declared: il? of? of? institutions dell'OLP who allegedly represent the entire Palestinian nation in recent years? become obsolete and unimportant. Do not include any representation for a national religious movement like Hamas (which holds that religion takes the nationality? Of precedence (sic), although its supporters make up hours about one third of the Palestinian public
No comments:
Post a Comment